‘Boring, boring Villa’ sang our fans in frustration, as we once again failed to find the net at White Hart Lane against stubborn opponents. For me though, there was a far more boring reality that I see looming on the horizon.

Liverpool are now fourth, despite having played terribly for most of the season. They’re grinding out victories in an ominous fashion and if we, or either Villa or Manchester City don’t get out acts together, then Liverpool will finish fourth and the ‘big four’ will reign supreme yet again. Now that’s boring.

On the evidence of this match, neither Spurs nor Villa have what it takes to break into the top four. Villa just don’t have enough quality in their strikers and are thus forced to play a very tight game, trying to sneak 1-0 victories and away draws. I just don’t see them winning enough games to make it.

One thing that you couldn’t accuse us of is not trying our very best to score, but on too many occasions we are being denied. We outplayed Villa over two games and had countless half-chances, but couldn’t convert them. The same has been true against Stoke, Wolves and Hull.

The problem (strangely for a team that was able to score 9 goals in a single match) is up front. Defoe is a brilliant forward, but is reliant on a strike partner to create chances for him. So far this season we’ve had two plans. Plan A is to play Defoe alongside Crouch and hit balls up to the big striker to knock down. Plan B worked so badly that it is currently on loan at Celtic.

What I found strange about this game was that we didn’t at some point opt to try the new Plan B and bring on Gudjohnsen up front, behind Defoe. He might not be fully fit, but with us having all the possession for the last 20 minutes, it surely couldn’t have hurt.

Perhaps Redknapp thought that the game hung too much in the balance, to risk the equilibrium. If we’re going to finish above Liverpool though, then we need wins. We have to take risks. Modric played pretty well, but why not bring on Kranjcar, who poses far more of a goal threat?

Some of the papers highlighted Brad Friedel as having a particularly brilliant game. I don’t think that we really tested him that much and most of our shots were quite comfortable for him to save. His best stop was to palm away Ledley King’s flick, from which Defoe might have done better on the rebound. In truth, Gomes had to make equally good saves in our goal, albeit on less occasions.

Their back four certainly were superb, especially Dunne. God knows why City sold him, as he’s better than any of their current defenders.

I’ve seen Tottenham sites accusing Villa of playing for a draw from the off. I didn’t see it this way and thought that the first half was pretty open, with both sides committing men forward. In the second half, after a bit of early pressure, Villa seemed content to settle for a draw and just sit back.

On the positives for us, our back four had a good game. Against Ashley Young, Bale defended well and was still able to get forward. Bentley had a decent match and created most of our best chances with his set-pieces.

Huddlestone and Palacios had the measure of their midfield and it was good to see The Hudd testing their keeper with a couple of stinging shots. Up front, Crouch probably caused them more problems than Defoe, but as I’ve said earlier, we needed to change tact at some point.

Liverpool will slip up again and drop points. Quite possibly they will even do so this week against The Scum and then their next game is away at Manchester City.

The question is, are we and Villa going to be able to capitalise upon it, or will we be dropping points ourselves? I’ve got my doubts as to whether either of us will be up to the task. Still, at least in Spurs’ case, it won’t be for the lack of trying.

We looking for new writers. Click here for more details.



  1. Fair play Dan – as a Villa fan that’s one of the most balanced and accurate articles I’ve read. The truth is we are not a boring side and have a lot of attacking talent on the wings and in midfield – our real problem is up front where we are lacking quality, as you pointed out. In many games we are exciting to watch – fast attacking play using old fashioned wingers to cross the ball from the by-line (not lumping it up from the back). However, against Spurs on both occasions this season, and this is credit to you, we have been very poor (except in defence), hence I can see why we would look pretty dull to you guys – that’s because you played well against us and over ran us in midfield, which can often happen due to our wide players being stuck on the touchline. Anyway, good luck for the rest of the season, here’s to Liverpool finishing seventh.

  2. Yep, as a Villa fan that is the most balanced article I’ve read on the match. A lot of Spurs fans bizarrely assume we play that crap every game, and that we’re a boring side. Truth is, we didn’t turn up (with the exception of the back 4). It was the same in the other game, we didn’t play.

    I think it’s credit to us for getting 2 points against a very good side despite playing poorly both times. A lot of Spurs fans seem to think it must mean we’re a terrible, negative side. Bizarre really, how can a poor side win at United and Liverpool, beat Chelsea, reach a cup final…. Good luck for the season.

  3. lot of what you said was spot dan it wasnt the style of play which was boring its just we pushed them back and back with no where to go.
    First of all i dont like harry neaver have neaver will but i am a spur first and formost and will put up with anything [even man in a raincoat and we got him out eventually] Playing a route one football which i hate [hughes book of coaching]thought defensivly they were brilliant and agree with you friedal made good saves the papers seem to go on about brilliant keepers wrong
    WE have definetly got to get more options .
    But they sussed out what to do from hull stoke and wolves [time waste] but more suttle friedal was time wasting switching goalkicks slowing down free kicks and throws but the main thing dan[this is where iam a lune watched the game again ]was fouls and foy quite a few of the so called fouls espicially second half have a look the ones like milner with hudd ball went away from hudd milner jumped in agony got free kick but hudd neaver touched him this went on quite a bit
    also players like is it quellar went for ball in his area
    went down holding face game went on eventually he saw game going on and got up quickly other incidents like that all over maybe because of the pressure put on them
    FOY was garbage and got a lot of these decisions wrong soon as a player went down he blew up
    But saying that it is happening a hell of alot now
    i mean gerrard sat went down like a sack of spuds with a head injury everton player neaver touched him
    pathetic it was but ref was conned.

  4. Very fair commentn- – the spurs played well in the 2nd half and on chances should have won it by a mile.But hats off to Villa and mandefended superbly and when you do that there is always a chance that you can nick the game. As for the boring comments you can not base your opinion on the Villa on this display when we have defeated the red scouse and manure utd at their grounds and defeated cheskie at the Villa – you do not do that by playing boring football


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.